Post by account_disabled on Jan 9, 2024 7:18:00 GMT 1
so positioning myself on informative keywords, even without converting, gives me pleasure and satisfaction. Leaving aside the medical update , which in many ways has not yet been understood and examined, I find that despite many casual and unjust deaths and injuries, there was Google 's desire to give a clear, and absolutely shareable, cut to the contents without a 'soul. Content index Misleading content The medical market is very tempting The problem of real professionals Does this problem only exist in medicine? Is Google always an ugly and evil machine?
Misleading content Until last year I encountered large sites, in a very competitive Phone Number List market, useless, incorrect content, which led the user into complete confusion. You searched on Google : "symptoms of respiratory failure" (this example actually happened to me) and among the first you found a site that explained these symptoms as best as possible, often going off topic, but which in the end suggested you buy insoles for the pain at the feet. But the domain had trust, it had many links that pushed it and it positioned itself ahead of much more useful and certainly competent resources. You were looking for information on "shock waves" (a very effective therapy that has a very specific method
of use that varies from pathology to pathology, with a different number of shots, the therapeutic choice of which is up to the professional who carries it out), and you you found a site that talked about 10,000 shots, which if someone did this treatment would cause harm to their patient. But a poor unfortunate (or average user...) who was looking for information would probably find himself asking his physiotherapist for a harmful treatment, perhaps questioning the competence of a professional, just because "it was written on the Internet " ! The medical market is
Misleading content Until last year I encountered large sites, in a very competitive Phone Number List market, useless, incorrect content, which led the user into complete confusion. You searched on Google : "symptoms of respiratory failure" (this example actually happened to me) and among the first you found a site that explained these symptoms as best as possible, often going off topic, but which in the end suggested you buy insoles for the pain at the feet. But the domain had trust, it had many links that pushed it and it positioned itself ahead of much more useful and certainly competent resources. You were looking for information on "shock waves" (a very effective therapy that has a very specific method
of use that varies from pathology to pathology, with a different number of shots, the therapeutic choice of which is up to the professional who carries it out), and you you found a site that talked about 10,000 shots, which if someone did this treatment would cause harm to their patient. But a poor unfortunate (or average user...) who was looking for information would probably find himself asking his physiotherapist for a harmful treatment, perhaps questioning the competence of a professional, just because "it was written on the Internet " ! The medical market is